I’m all for creative and quirky advertising, in fact I think this is often the most effective marketing. However, there is a fine line between creativity and effectiveness and I think that the Vick’s First Defence advertising fails to deliver the message for this product.
The main reason I question the Return on Investment for these ads, is because when I saw this ad I didn’t even know how it tied into Vicks and at first I didn’t even know it was an ad for Vicks. I honestly thought this was generic Vicks advertising because the ad doesn’t spell out that First Defence is actually a Vicks product. I mainly saw this ad on trains or tubes. Advertising on the tube has its advantages and disadvantages. The main disadvantage of this vehicle is that the tube is an extremely busy place and people usually have the mindset of getting to and from somewhere in a hurry. The attention span of your audience is already limited, and this is shortened further on the tube. This means you need to grab the
target market’s attention quickly and maintain it, whilst calling them to perform an action. After viewing this ad, I assumed that Vicks wanted me to buy some cold and flu medicine, I had no idea of the exact product.
The visual focus of the ad is on the soccer ball and the goalkeepers gloves- which is a sure fire way to get most of England’s attention. The soccer ball and gloves almost appear as part of an equation. This is where I feel that Vicks missed out on a trick. Vicks are not part of the equation in my mind. I feel that they should have placed an image of the First defence bottle at the end of the equation. It brings the story together- showing that Vicks First Defence is the answer to the problem. This
would also enable the consumer to recognise the product and help trigger product recall when they are in the Chemist buying the product.
It’s also worth discussing that considerations for storage on trains must be taken into account when placing advertisements. There is a shelf so to speak to store your bags on above each passengers head. When bags are stored the advertisement could be blocked entirely. However, there is always going to be the storage shelf to contend with. When I saw this Vicks First Defence ad on the train, the storage shelf
space blocked out the writing at the bottom of the ad- which helps to explain
the ad.
At the end of the day, I feel that a quirky ad was created and the message was severely diluted. I think that people will remember the different scenarios; soccer ball and gloves, raindrops and umbrellas and that’s it, people will be left wondering what is going on. I don’t believe that consumers would be left with the feeling of wondering what the ad was about and undertake additional research to understand this due to the product category and the mediums that the advert was placed in. Rather, I feel that people will quickly scan the ad, and then quickly turn their
attention elsewhere.
If this were a football game, I’d place the Vicks First Defence ad on the bench.
Arron Child








